Crabb, Barbara Brandriff

Court:

Western District of Wisconsin

Title:

Chief Judge

Chambers:

Madison, WI

Status:

Active

Nomination Information:

Educational Background:

President:

Jimmy Carter

Law School:

University of Wisconsin Madison, J.D., 1962

Nominated:

1979

Other Schools:

University of Wisconsin, Madison, B.A., 1960

Confirmed:

1979

 

Prior Federal Judicial Service:

U.S. Magistrate, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, 1971-1979


Professional Career History:

Private practice, Madison, Wisconsin, 1962-1964

Research assistant, George Bunn, University of Wisconsin Law School, 1968-1969

Research assistant, ABA Project on Minimum Standards of Criminal Justice, 1970-1971


Most Recent Notifications::

Decision Status Date
No notifications have been submitted for this judge yet.
[view all notifications for this court]


Most Recent Blog Posts:

There are no blog posts for this judge yet.

Law Clerk Demographics (2010-11 Term)

Law School Clerk Type Hired As J.D. Year

We have no law clerk information for this judge yet.


Law Clerk Demographics (2009-10 Term):

Law School Clerk Type Hired As J.D. Year

We have no law clerk information for this judge yet.


Law Clerk Demographics (2008-09 Term):

Law School Clerk Type Hired As J.D. Year

We have no law clerk information for this judge yet.


Comments for Crabb, Barbara Brandriff () for the 2010 Cycle

Leave a Comment Visitor Comments
Fill out this form to add a new comment.
Author:
Date: 2012-05-23 15:26:47
Cycle:
Subject:
Comment:
Security Code:

CAPTCHA Image
Reload Image


NOTE: Our spam blocker automatically blocks all posts attempting to link to other websites. If you have tried to post something and it did not show up, please repost it without the hyperlink.

 ruling on federal day of prayer

Apr 17, 2010, 12:17 PM 
2010 Cycle #1

Thank you for your leadership and courage in ruling that a federal day of prayer is unconstitutional. There are many who would shy away from addressing an issue that is as emotionally charged, misunderstood by the masses, and so clearly based on irrational thought. I have no doubt you will encounter strong resistance, harsh language, and possibly even threats as a result of this ruling. However, the Founding Fathers' intention is clear, and you've fortified our FIrst Amendment to a very substantial degree. You have MANY supporters!

 – Matthew Runde, MD (Unregistered)

 
 

 Rejection

Jun 24, 2011, 9:49 PM 
2010 Cycle #2

Email rejections sent out today.

 – Anonymous (Unregistered)