Brimmer, Clarence Addison Jr.

Court:

District of Wyoming

Title:

Senior Judge

Chambers:

Cheyenne, WY

Status:

Senior (2006)

Nomination Information:

Educational Background:

President:

Gerald Ford

Law School:

University of Michigan Ann Arbor, J.D., 1947

Nominated:

1975

Other Schools:

University of Michigan, B.A., 1944

Confirmed:

1975

 

Prior Federal Judicial Service:

None


Professional Career History:

U.S. Air Force Sergeant, 1945-1946

Private practice, Rawlins, Wyoming, 1947-1971

State attorney general, Wyoming, 1971-1974

Private practice, Rawlins, Wyoming, 1974

U.S. Attorney for the District of Wyoming, 1975


Most Recent Notifications::

Decision Status Date
No notifications have been submitted for this judge yet.
[view all notifications for this court]


Most Recent Blog Posts:

There are no blog posts for this judge yet.

Law Clerk Demographics (2010-11 Term)

Law School Clerk Type Hired As J.D. Year

We have no law clerk information for this judge yet.


Law Clerk Demographics (2009-10 Term):

Law School Clerk Type Hired As J.D. Year

We have no law clerk information for this judge yet.


Law Clerk Demographics (2008-09 Term):

Law School Clerk Type Hired As J.D. Year

We have no law clerk information for this judge yet.


Comments for Brimmer, Clarence Addison Jr. () for the 2010 Cycle

Leave a Comment Visitor Comments
Fill out this form to add a new comment.
Author:
Date: 2012-05-21 18:50:24
Cycle:
Subject:
Comment:
Security Code:

CAPTCHA Image
Reload Image


NOTE: Our spam blocker automatically blocks all posts attempting to link to other websites. If you have tried to post something and it did not show up, please repost it without the hyperlink.

 clarence brimmer

Jan 24, 2010, 1:43 AM 
2010 Cycle #1

I am goin to have case 05-CV-311B reviewed again.Attourneys John Hursh and Nicholas Vassallo may be responsible for missleading the court and burying evidence that needed to be presented so that our elerly judge could see it. It's not a game to us.I'm in a lot of pain every day because the defendants in my case were allowed to ignore expert testemony as merely probable or possibly the truth.I bet I would not be allowed the same defense if I was the defense!

 – David Fienhold (Unregistered)